09 April, 2021
Top 6 Wordpress Plugins to Use in 2023
27 December, 2022
Docker and Kubernetes are the two most widely used tools in contemporary cloud-native container ecosystem. Due to the utility they offer and the openness of their communities, these two open platforms have allowed the container revolution to flourish. Although they are frequently combined, Docker and Kubernetes serve separate purposes. Understanding how contemporary containers are created, deployed, and maintained in production depends on this distinction.
If you are involved in cloud-native technologies like containers, you have probably heard of Docker and Kubernetes and may be wondering how they connect to each other. Is it Kubernetes vs. Docker, Kubernetes and Docker, or both? In this article, we will talk about Kubernetes vs. docker difference.
Docker is a container packaging and operating tool. Docker assists in the creation of standard containers that have all of the components required for them to work in isolation, such as code dependencies and libraries.
Docker is a container management tool rather than a container format. Developers commonly engage with Docker using a command line interface (CLI) to connect with the Docker client and execute commands such as docker build or docker run. Such commands are converted into API instructions for the Docker daemon dockerd, which instructs the system to create the environment.
Docker images, which are executable templates, are stored in a Docker registry. Docker containers are, therefore, just instances of these images. Moreover, Docker Hub is a big public registry that contains a significant number of users, including pre-written container images.
Kubernetes, often known as K8s, is a powerful, complex toolkit designed to automate various application life cycle tasks. K8s is similar to the ultimate game of Tetris in that it determines container placement to maximize computer resources, "orchestrating" where these workloads end up. It also has self-healing features, which allow it to autonomously repair and restart containers if they fail.
Understanding Kubernetes architecture is similar to peeling back the layers of an onion. Every Kubernetes deployment includes at least one cluster. Nodes make up a cluster. These nodes serve as pod hosts. A running set of containers is included in these pods. A control plane manages all of these components in a Kubernetes instance.
This architecture may appear too complex, but it is required to guarantee the fault-tolerance and high availability that Kubernetes offers. Many other critical K8s components are at work here, including kubectl, the command-line interface for controlling Kubernetes clusters; kube-scheduler, which maintains availability and performance; and kubelet, the primary agent that runs on each pod. Kubernetes may be installed on Linux, macOS, or Windows, and accessible via a web interface or REST API.
Here is the difference between Kubernetes vs. Docker:
Parameter |
Kubernetes |
Docker |
Developed by |
|
Docker Inc |
Year Released |
2014 |
2013 |
GitHub forks |
18.7K |
15.5K |
GitHub Stars |
54.1K |
53.8K |
Companies using |
9GAG, Intuit, Buffer, Evernote, etc. |
Spotify, Pinterest, eBay, Twitter, etc. |
Large clusters |
Offers container deployment and scaling, even in large clusters, without considering the speed. |
Speed is considered for the strong cluster states. |
Community |
Offers strong support from open source communities and big companies like Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and IBM |
An active user base which regularly updates the software. |
Compatibility |
More comprehensive and highly customizable |
Less extensive and customizable |
Container Limit |
Limited to 300000 containers |
Limited to 95000 container |
Node Support |
Supports up to 5000 nodes |
Supports 2000 > nodes |
Tolerance ratio |
Low fault tolerance |
High fault tolerance |
Scaling |
Auto-scaling |
No Autoscaling |
Installation |
Complicated & time-consuming. |
Easy & fast |
Data volume |
Shares storage volumes with any other container |
Shares storage volumes between multiple containers in the same pod. |
If you are creating and managing your own infrastructure, Docker Swarm often takes less setup and configuration than Kubernetes. Similar advantages to Kubernetes are provided by this system, including declarative YAML file deployment, automated service scaling to your desired state, load balancing across containers within a cluster, and security and access management for all of your services.
Docker Swarm could be a wonderful option if you just have a few active workloads, don't mind maintaining your own infrastructure, or don't require a certain functionality Kubernetes provides.
Although initially more difficult to set up, Kubernetes offers more flexibility and functionality. Additionally, a large and vibrant open-source community supports it.
Kubernetes can handle your network ingress, supports a variety of deployment options out of the box, and gives your containers built-in observability. Every large cloud provider offers managed Kubernetes services, which make it much simpler to get started and utilize cloud-native capabilities like auto-scaling.
Kubernetes is probably the platform you should take into consideration if you are managing a lot of workloads, need cloud-native interoperability, and have many teams working together in your company.
Conclusion
Docker and Kubernetes have both been developed to meet the demands of microservices development. In this model, teams must iterate quickly and provide highly accessible services to consumers. Containers offer a lightweight, scalable method of delivering these apps, but managing them at scale is difficult. Migrating to contemporary container management technologies results in faster deployment and cost savings.
We believe the information we have shared about each platform will help you in selecting the suitable one for your business needs. Are you in need of a professional freelance web developer for your project, head straight to our website to hire the best talents.